Emphatic assertion – making a bold evaluation

To make a clear, assertive statement that signals the speaker believes the point is noteworthy even if surprising.

When emphasizing an especially strong claim; when the speaker wants to signal confidence but also hints at potential surprise.

Formal discussions, academic writing, persuasive speeches, editorial commentaries where credibility and emphasis matter.

I’d go so far as to say that;

I’d go so far as to say that;

a clause expressing a strong opinion or evaluation

• that
• it is
• they are
• the claim is

• I would go as far as to say (slightly more formal)
• I would even say (less formal)
• I’d venture to say (more tentative)

Omitting 'as' (e.g., 'I’d go far to say'), using 'to' instead of 'as' (e.g., 'I’d go so far to say'), or omitting 'that' after the phrase when followed by a clause

I’d venture to suggest, I’m tempted to say, I might go so far as to, I’d say without hesitation

The structure follows a literal translation of ‘aller aussi loin que de dire’, which may cause confusion for non‑native speakers unfamiliar with this fixed collocation.

• Bold evaluation

Signals intentional extremity; implies the speaker is aware the claim is strong and may invite skepticism, thus inviting the listener to take it seriously or question it.

Elevates the weight of the statement, signals confidence, and subtly invites critical engagement from the audience.

I’d go so far as to say — I’d even say

This chunk is typically used to introduce a strong opinion or fact, often in a context where the speaker wants to emphasize the importance or boldness of their statement. It is commonly found in formal and persuasive contexts, such as academic writing, professional discussions, and editorial commentaries. The negative form is also frequently used to soften a claim or to hedge against potential disagreement.

I’d go so far as to say → I would venture to state → I make bold to say